Question

ʰᵉʳᵉ ʷᵉ ᵍᵒ ⤵️⤵️

ǫᴜᴇ :- ᴅᴏ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ʀᴇᴀʟʟʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ғʀᴇᴇ ᴡɪʟʟ ?¿​

Answer 1

$\huge\mathcal\purple{{<u>Q</u><u>U</u><u>E</u><u>S</u><u>T</u><u>I</u><u>O</u><u>N</u><u>}</u><u>}</u>$

Do people really have free will ?

$\huge\mathfrak\pink{{♡<u>A</u><u>N</u><u>S</u><u>W</u><u>E</u><u>R</u>♡}}$

The free will issue is especially thorny because it represents a collision between two opposing, yet equally valid, perspectives. From a purely metaphysical perspective, if we don't have free will, why are we here? What is the point of life if we cannot choose our own paths? Yet from a purely scientific perspective, how is it possible that anything can occur without having been caused by something else? If we really can choose, then these choices must be uncaused — something that cannot be explained within the model of science that many of us rely on.

$\large\mathcal\green{{♡Hope\:This\:Will\:Help\:You♡}}$

$\huge\mathfrak\red{{♡ElegantPrincess♡}}$

Answer 2

☺ Khuda Hafiz bhaija☺

The free will issue is especially thorny because it represents a collision between two opposing, yet equally valid, perspectives. From a purely metaphysical perspective, if we don't have free will, why are we here? What is the point of life if we cannot choose our own paths? Yet from a purely scientific perspective, how is it possible that anything can occur without having been caused by something else? If we really can choose, then these choices must be uncaused — something that cannot be explained within the model of science that many of us rely on.