1. Circle the correct option.
We can see that there has been a huge price to pay for the economic develop-developing-development) that
rich countries have achieved. (because therefore-that's why) to reach this standard of living, these countries
have used a lot of natural resources and polluted the atmosphere-ground-water). Now developing countries are
trying to catch up and it seems that economic growth in countries like China or India, with their huge
populations.(had to-must-might) also have a serious(affect-effect-affection) on the environment. But can we
really say that poorer countries should stop developing? Obviously that wouldn't be realistic, or fair. Of course,
if we want to be more (environment- environmental environmentally) friendly we can recycle or drive cars that
pollute a bit less, or even use fower plastic bags.
Answers
Answered by
1
Explanation:
veheiruuurueih hegyehsjhdgdjdjr
Answered by
1
It would be a fair assumption to make that a country with a large amount of natural resources would be more likely to develop fastest and furthest. This could be assumed because natural resources in a country would be likely to stimulate trade at first within that country, and later to outside countries.
Similar questions