Question

1) Living Environment vs Health
information​

Answer 1

your answer

Human Health and the Natural Environment

Fifty years ago, the World Health Organization (WHO) defined health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.” This definition should serve as a reminder that redefining the view of environmental health and the natural environment requires many shifts in thinking, as well as a willingness to pursue a diversity of approaches.

Advances in the field of environmental health have taught us much about human health hazards; for example, air pollution can cause respiratory disease, heavy metals can cause neurotoxicity, global climate change is likely to fuel the spread of infectious diseases. Domestically, the response has been to clean up the environment, a laudable goal, said Rafe Pomerance of Sky Trust. Environmental health issues traditionally have been addressed at the international level within the context of such issues as ozone depletion, climate change, and biodiversity. Countries have tried to address these issues through the multilateral process, such as multilateral agreements and commissions, bilateral assistance and cooperation, private sector investment, trade, the work of nongovernmental organizations, education, and training.

These efforts can be profoundly effective, asserted Pomerance; witness the reductions in the emissions of chlorofluorocarbons achieved through legislation and transnational agreements in the 1970s. Industry, especially newer companies with the capacity to design “greener” manufacturing practices, has made some inroads into environmentally friendly production. However, efforts have not been so successful in maintaining biodiversity, said Pomerance, as the world continues to lose species on a daily basis. Challenges also remain in assuring a safe and healthful food supply.

The natural environment, broadly conceived, can also enhance health, for example, many pharmaceuticals are derived from plants and animals, providing a compelling argument for preserving biodiversity. In addition, contact with the natural world may be directly beneficial to health. If so, then the field of environmental health needs to extend beyond mere considerations of toxicity. According to the speakers, research and policy must be directed toward understanding the interactions of human health and the natural environment, from the most personal level—that is, how individuals interact with the world around them—to the global scale—that is, how nations agree to reduce pollution, pursue sound agricultural and land use practices, and feed their citizens. Each of these issues is explored below.

thanks

follow me

mark as brainlist

Answer 2

Living Environment vs Health information.

Explanation:

• Health is described as the well being body with the proper functioning mind and nature.
• Due to the pollution, health is getting affected by air, water, global changes, toxicity in the environment and many other things.
• Health information can be collected by checking on it and getting a monthly checkup and taking precautions.
• Several countries are trying to work out on these problems through organizations, campaigns, and spreading awareness.
• The living environment is the area In which we are living and the nature of it.
• As all the problems are mentioned above, it is causing a negative effect in living environment which is hazardous for our health.
• This is how the living environment and health information are interrelated.

Learn more about living environment and health information.

What we need for healthy living environment?

https://brainly.in/question/12805569