1. The British did more harm than good. Explain this with pieces of evidence from the text that support this statement. the British rule.
Answers
The British Raj did more harm than good in the Indian subcontinent, concluded a historic debate that put the mighty empire on a mock trial at the Supreme Court.
The Indo-British Heritage Trust organised the debate as the inaugural event to mark the 400th anniversary of formal relations between India and Britain back in 1614. The motion before the house was, "The Indian sub-continent benefited more than it lost from the experience of British Colonialism".
The team against the motion, eloquently led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor and including fellow authors William Dalrymple and Nick Robins, clinched a decisive victory.
please mark me as brainlist
Answer:
The British rule brought both good and bad. But all the good things were hidden by the bad. That lead to the saying “British did more harm than good”
The Empire brought blood and suffering to millions, but it also brought railways, roads and education. For good or ill, much of the world is the way it is today because of the Empire, from the way it looks, to the sports people play, from the religion we practise, to the language we speak.
The negative effects of British rule were Exploitation, destruction of local industry, deforestation, and famine.
The British rule introduced the railways, the press, and the western system of education, clubs and associations all of which shook the prevalent socio-economic order. But the processes of exploitation unleashed by them destroyed the possibilities of development of industries and a modern economic system in India.
Please mark as Brainliest if my answer helped you Army
I purple you