Question

1 UNREAD MESSAGE
Internet file sharing programs are popular
among college students. These programs
work bvy allowing non-organizational users
to access any local network where desired
files are located. Because these types of file
sharing programs tend to clog bandwidth,
local users' ability to access and use a local
network is reduced. What ethical and social
responsibilities does a university have in
this situation? To whom do they have a
responsibility? What guidelines might you
suggest for university decision makers?
23:21
co
☺ Type a message​

Answer 1

Answer:

They should work more on this process

Answer 2

Answer:

Many users, particularly the young, have made staying connected a top goal. Public and private institutions have developed free access to their networks in order to give this service to clients, extending the scope of internet access. This opportunity also comes with significant security and speed implications that consumers and providers must weigh.

Explanation:

• In this situation, the university's social obligations are to maintain and give quality service on their internet file-sharing program; by extending the system's infrastructure, it will be large enough to accommodate more local people to use the system; nevertheless, in order to make the program much more successful, the university must also impose specific standards.
• Users are only permitted to utilize the system for a certain time, and any data bigger than a specified number of gigabytes must be requested directly via USB file transfer.
• Since the bandwidth and network will not be overloaded, the online file-sharing software will succeed if the following rules are followed.
• WIFI service may be forbidden on campus if the university is a for-profit institution that follows the traditional viewpoint.
• They may discourage the use of these file-sharing programs on the internet if they thought of themselves as a socially responsible corporation.
• Depending on whether the institution is public or private, their responsibilities will change.
• Although it is reasonable to presume that all institutions have a duty to educate their pupils. In order to remain competitive and grow enrollment, schools should embrace public expectations.
• They should examine their public image and future possibilities to ensure long-term financial needs and longevity.

#SPJ3