1.- Why was Abel Fields convicted?Because he was found guilty, he wassentencedto pay a fine of $1,000.2.- What law was he convicted under?The Stolen Valor Act3.- How did the appeals court rule on the case?Abel was charger with a bank robbery. One of his… The United States Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuitreversed.4.- What has fields argued in his case before the Supreme Court?Arguedthat the Stolen Valor Actwasunconstitutional, and thathisright to free speechhadbeen violated,therefore, I will be taking in a count of several similar rulings on othercasesto help me make a decision.5.-What are Fields's prosecutors arguing?Fields was sentenced to death largely based on the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he couldconfidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future.Abel FieldsAbel Fields was a 39-year-old resident of a city in California. In 2011, he attended a city meeting aboutpublic safety. He spoke publicly at the meeting, explaining that his military experience gave him theknowledge to speak with authority about public safety issues. During his speech, he claimed that he had
Answers
The answer to the questions are:
Why was Abel Fields convicted?
Abel Fields was sentenced because he was found guilty, he was sentenced to pay a fine of $1,000.
What law was he convicted under?
He was convicted under the Stolen Valor Act.
How did the appeals court rule on the case?
Fields pursued his choice to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. He contended that the Stolen Valor Act was illegal and that his entitlement to free discourse had been abused. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals governed in support of himself. Be that as it may, the public authority pursued the choice, and the Supreme Court consented to hear the case.
What have Fields argued in his case before the Supreme Court?
He contended that the Stolen Valor Act was unlawful and that his entitlement to free discourse had been abused.
What are Fields's prosecutors arguing?
Fields were condemned to death generally founded on the assessment of therapist he could confidently foresee Fields would be risky later on. He talked openly at the gathering, clarifying that his tactical experience gave him the knowledge to talk with power about open security issues. During his discourse, he asserted that he had