Question

10. Circle the correct option.
We can see that there has been a huge price to pay for the economic develop-developing-development) that
rich countries have achieved. (because therefore-that's why) to reach this standard of living, these countries
have used a lot of natural resources and polluted the atmosphere-ground-water). Now developing countries are
trying to catch up and it seems that economic growth in countries like China or India, with their huge
populations,(had to-must-might) also have a serious(affect-effect-affection) on the environment. But can we
really say that poorer countries should stop developing? Obviously that wouldn't be realistic, or fair. Of course,
if we want to be more (environment- environmental-environmentally) friendly we can recycle or drive cars that
pollute a bit less, or even use fewer plastic bags.​

Answer 1

Answer:

Answer is as:

Explanation:

1. development

2. therefore.

3. atmosphere.

4. might.

5. effect.

6. environment.

Answer 2

It would be a fair assumption to make that a country with a large amount of natural resources would be more likely to develop fastest and furthest. This could be assumed because natural resources in a country would be likely to stimulate trade at first within that country, and later to outside countries.