14 out of 195 countries spend lesser than Pakistan on education and it is stressed on spending more on education as at the current net enrolment growth rate of 0.92 pc, it will take another 60 years to reach the target of zero out of school children. This simply means that even after three generations Pakistan would not be in position to claim ‘No Child Left Behind’. The nobilities are taking that matter very seriously and urging government to impose tax on the masses who are affording to send their kids for private education in schools where monthly fees is Rs.3,000.00 and above.
Your task is to critically evaluate the impact of such regulations Use sound arguments in support of your response.
Answers
Answered by
0
Due to instability of the country of Pakistan there has been less amount of money that the nation is able to spend on education as compared to the other countries.
Explanation:
- However there are division of the money between the rich and the poor in a very and organised manner
- as a result of this there are people who can afford lavish education.
- On the other hand there are students who do not get the basic amount of education ,even though it is one of their right.
- As a result of this it has been a point of debate that people who belong to higher economics strata should be charged more amount of tax so that the money is invested on the education of the children who belong from poor class.
To know more about education in Pakistan,
Write a short note on problems of education in Pakistan? - Brainly.in
https://brainly.in/question/18486045
Similar questions