15) ‘Self-reliance, Indian independence and help to sharecroppers were all bound together’. Elucidate with — reference to the chapter Indigo.
Answers
Gandhi stayed in Champaran for a long time. The Champaran episode was a turning point in his life. It was during this struggle in 1917 that he decided to urge the departure of the British.
Champaran episode did not begin as an act of defiance. It grew out of an attempt to make the sufferings of large numbers of poor peasants less severe. Gandhi concentrated on their practical day to day problems. He analysed the root cause of the problem-fear, and tried to eradicate it. The voluntary demonstration of the poor peasants against the government for putting Gandhi in trouble was the beginning of the end of their fear of the British.
In everything Gandhi did, he tried to mould a new free Indian who could stand on his own feet and thus make India free. He taught his lawyer friends a lesson in self-reliance by opposing the involvement of C.F. Andrews, an Englishman in .their unequal fight. His help would be a prop. This would reflect their weakness. Their cause was just and they must rely on themselves to win the battle. Thus self-reliance, Indian independence and help to sharecroppers were all bound together.
Hope it helps you buddy!
Gandhi tarried in Champaran for a prolonged period. The Champaran episode was a turning point in his life. It was during this struggle in 1917 that he determined to impulse the egress of the British. Champaran episode did not arise as a manoeuvre of temerity. It pullulates out of a venture to make the dolour of copious aggregates of pauperising muzhik sparser tempestuous. Gandhi was assiduous on their heuristic unvarying katzenjammer. He anatomised the fons et origo of the predicament-consternation and sought to deracinate it. The volitional blockade of the destitute yeomen against the Government for placing Gandhi in vexation was the vestige of their abhorrence of the British. In the whole lot, Gandhi did strive to paradigm a new emancipated Indian who could perch on his own feet and thus make India unchained. He indoctrinated his lawyer compatriots a precept in self-reliance by rejecting the connivance of C.F. Andrews, an Englishman, in their inequitable belligerence. His aid would be a prop. It would indicate their weakness. Their conviction was becoming, which endeavoured that they must swear by on themselves to prevail the struggle. Thus, self-reliance, Indian independence and help to sharecroppers were all bound together.