English, asked by anananan1120, 1 month ago

-15 to help you locate them easily while answering some of these questions. There is a strong conservative bias against review, reform and amendment I do not accept that bias as legitimate. The constitution is a dynamic document. It was conceptualised as a response to the challenges seen by the founding fathers. But then, much water has flown down India's rivers since 1960. After so many amendments though we have yet to score a century there is no justification for resisting change. Change for the sake of change leads nowhere. But purposeful change postulates a national discourse and debate. It also postulates an objective analysis and a constructive approach. The review commission was constituted with those objective. Unfortunately. It had a somewhat contentious start. The commission has made many recommendations which deserve careful consideration. But perhaps it failed to enthuse and arouse we the people of India. Compare this to the consultative process which preceded the making of South Africa's constitution, in which I was a participant. No doubt, it was a green field exercise in constitution making But numerically and qualitatively, its involvement of all sections of people is an example. I wish we could emulate it. The review commission's report is a half-filled and hat empty cup. Of course, its task was difficult and complex. But the sum of there is obviously an than the sum total of the bent I would not faut the commission divided on the sun, which serialy a potical one. The e as stands does not prevent a naturalised citizen from seeking any offe constitutional amendment if any in that respect would essenialy be a political determination of the India is a union of states, some less federal than others. On the other hand india's ederism the test of time Federalism is not a stesc concept it has to evolve. Moreover, states must have the wa and wherewitha to discharge responsibility entrusted to them under the status Many of the Bar Commission's recommendations need to be reviewed in the ight of the Venkatachafish commissions recommendations. A federation is the ultimate analyst, a recognition of diversities and an affirmation of unty amidst all these diversities. It is as fundamental as the principle of aecularism democracy and the rule of law Partition was brought about by a psychosis of alienation and which continues to divide today. It is a pity we have not worked out a reasonable and chilised modus operand. Votebank pritis has accentuated and multiplied the many divides which fragment and fracture our payche. The breakdown of civilised behaviour has diminished us at I have stond all my ile for ante fath understanding, commun amity and harmonious reciprocity of relations. Our constitution is based on that ideology The ground reality of the communal vide is as ugly are ts manifestation. We cannot just the administration. As a people we must troopect and begin by blaming ourselves in ears all we have done is to go to the people every five years to exploit the vote bank 20 It can be said that the author is (1) an eminent jurist (3) a consultant (5) advocate of federation Q02 Though we century means that we have (1) not yet finished 60 years of conesturion (2) yet to cross 50 years of dominion (3) yet to prove our mark (4) Yet to be applauded Which of the following le responsible for India's breakdown and fragmentation? (1) India being less federal than some other countries (2) Hatred having its roots in the history of partition. (3) Administration as well as the administered all of these on which issue, can it be concluded, the commission were divided? 1) Process of naturalisation (2) political issues (3) constitutional amendment (4) person not of foreign origin seeking office What can substitute ground reality? (1) grass-roots (3) postulation (2) a founding father (4) a munbor of the review committee (2) the bare facts (4) reality shrouded in mystery an6 Which of the following in TRUE in context of the passage ? (1) The recommendation may not have appealed to the people at large (2) The commission is to be applauded for at its work done work talent (3) The commission has put in much more work than the talentit comprised of (4) South African constitution is not the only example that can be cited. 2.07 Has the commission according to the author, paved the way for constitutional reforms? (1) No (2) Yes (3) It is mined in controversies (4) can't say 8 Which of the following best describe is the Centre-state relationship in India? (1) states must be given the will to perform (2) India's federalism has stood the test of time. (3) India is a union of states (4) Our constitution promotes reciprocity of relations 209 Which of the following is NOT TRUE? (1) The state governance alone is not to blame (2) Amere change will lead nowhere (3) India's rivers have been inundated​

Answers

Answered by viloyeputho
3

Answer:

sorry I can't do this question

Answered by jeniferponrajnadar
0

please coppurect make me a brainlest beeter

Similar questions