Math, asked by soniasharma27oct, 1 year ago

164 are not perfect squares?give reason

Answers

Answered by chandanaintract

0

Answer:

yes 164 is not a perfect square number because the presiding square number is 144 and succeeding square number is 169

Previous Question

Next Question

Similar questions

English, 6 months ago

How did the gazelle escape?

Math, 6 months ago

A travels a distance of 24 km with a speed of 4km/hr. B start 1 hour late than A and he covers the same distance in 4 hours. Draw the graphs of their journey and find when and where B will meet A.

Math, 6 months ago

26 27 28 29 30 d) Rahul observed that a pack of five creams, each of 150 g, costs 500 and another pack of six creams each of 100 g costs 450. Which pack should Rahul buy so that he spends lesser amounts...

Math, 1 year ago

The denominator of a rational number is greater than its numerator by 8. If the numerator is increased by 1, the number obtained is 3/2 . If the rational number?

Hindi, 1 year ago

karamchariyon ki asudh hindi ke visas me durdarsak ke mahadeshak ko patra likhe...

Social Sciences, 1 year ago

On October 14 HDFC bank raised Rs.____ crore by issuing rupee-denominated masala bonds to overseas investors. 745 610 500 890 930...

English, 1 year ago

He said, " open the door." I said, "I will not !" convert it into indirect speech.

Physics, 1 year ago

define simple hormonic motion?