Math, asked by soniasharma27oct, 10 months ago

164 are not perfect squares?give reason

Answers

Answered by chandanaintract

0

Answer:

yes 164 is not a perfect square number because the presiding square number is 144 and succeeding square number is 169

Previous Question

Next Question

Similar questions

Math, 5 months ago

Solution of ∂u ∂x = 4∂u ∂y, given u(0,y) = 8e-3y, is....

Accountancy, 5 months ago

Business started with bank loan...

History, 5 months ago

Name any two English novelists from Mysuru division...

Math, 10 months ago

The denominator of a rational number is greater than its numerator by 8. If the numerator is increased by 1, the number obtained is 3/2 . If the rational number?

Hindi, 10 months ago

karamchariyon ki asudh hindi ke visas me durdarsak ke mahadeshak ko patra likhe...

Social Sciences, 1 year ago

On October 14 HDFC bank raised Rs.____ crore by issuing rupee-denominated masala bonds to overseas investors. 745 610 500 890 930...

English, 1 year ago

He said, " open the door." I said, "I will not !" convert it into indirect speech.

Physics, 1 year ago

define simple hormonic motion?