Math, asked by soniasharma27oct, 8 months ago

164 are not perfect squares?give reason

Answers

Answered by chandanaintract

0

Answer:

yes 164 is not a perfect square number because the presiding square number is 144 and succeeding square number is 169

Previous Question

Next Question

Similar questions

Chemistry, 4 months ago

गिव साइंटिफिक डेफिनेशन ऑफ एसिड एंड बेस...

Geography, 4 months ago

Which of the following is a secondary activity? (a) Steel industry (b) Tourism industry (c) Fishing (d) Agriculture...

Sociology, 4 months ago

3. What are the two types of Work?

Math, 8 months ago

The denominator of a rational number is greater than its numerator by 8. If the numerator is increased by 1, the number obtained is 3/2 . If the rational number?

Hindi, 8 months ago

karamchariyon ki asudh hindi ke visas me durdarsak ke mahadeshak ko patra likhe...

Social Sciences, 11 months ago

On October 14 HDFC bank raised Rs.____ crore by issuing rupee-denominated masala bonds to overseas investors. 745 610 500 890 930...

English, 11 months ago

He said, " open the door." I said, "I will not !" convert it into indirect speech.

Physics, 11 months ago

define simple hormonic motion?