Question

18. Statement: Only dogs are animals.
No historian is an animal.
Conclusions: I. Some dogs are not historians.
II. Some historians are not dogs.​

Answer 1

Answer:

both conclusion are incorrect as dogs and historians are seperated completely by the entity animals so they are not relatable

Step-by-step explanation:

if you like please mark it brainliest

Answer 2

Both Conclusion I and II are wrong.

• As per statement I, only dogs are animals. In this case, all animals are dogs.
• From statement II, we get that no historian is an animal means that there is no intersection between animals and historians. So, dogs and historians are also mutually exclusive.
• Therefore, some dogs cannot be historians, and all historians are not dogs.