Physics, asked by ali76407640, 21 hours ago

2-14 Two sites are being considered for wind power gen- eration. In the first site, the wind blows steadily at 7 m/s for 3000 hours per year, whereas in the second site the wind blows at 10 m/s for 1500 hours per year. Assuming the wind velocity is negligible at other times for simplicity, deter- mine which is a better site for wind power generation. Hint: Note that the mass flow rate of air is proportional to wind velocity

Answers

Answered by tamilelango211200
0

Answer:

The Kinetic energy possessed by the wind is considered as the mechanical energy.

Express the kinetic energy per unit mass for first site.

Ke1 = v^21/2

Here, kinetic energy of the wind in first site Ke1 and velocity of the wind in first is V1.

Substitute 7m/s for v1.

ke1 = (7m/s)2/2

= 24.5m2/s2

= 24.5m2/s2(IKJ/KG/1,000M2/S2)

= 0.0245KJ/KG

Thus, kinetic energy per unit mass for first site is 0.0245KJ/Kg

Explanation:

Answered by Anonymous
1

The second site is better for wind power generation.

Given:

  • Velocity (V_1) = 7 m/s
  • Velocity (V_2) = 10 m/s
  • Time (T_1) = 3000 hrs/year
  • Time (T_2) = 1500 hrs/year

To Find:

  • The calculation to determine which site is better for wind power generation.

Solution:

  • Power generation = rate of change in time with respect to kinetic energy.
  • The formula is given by, Power = ΔKE = \frac{m*v^{2}}{2}
  • From the above formula, we get to know that m ∝ v
  • So power ∝ V^{3} , power = Constant*V^{3}  
  • since mass flow rate is proportional to wind velocity, the area also would be same as turbine used.
  • For Site 1,
  • Power (P_{1}) = const.V^{3}  = constant(7 m/s)^{3} = constant (343) W
  • For Site 2,
  • Power (P_2 = const. V^{3} = constant(10 m/s)^{3} = constant(1000) W
  • Now let us calculate energy per year for each of the site.
  • E_{year_1} = P_1*T_1 = constant*343*3000 = constant(1029000) W.hr/year
  • E_{year_2}=P_2*T_2 = constant*1000*1500 = constant(1500000) W.hr/year
  • By the above data, E(year 2) > E(year 1)

∴ The second site is better for wind power generation.

Similar questions