English, asked by khushiverma231, 11 months ago

2 He had never been known to refuse food.
to He would tackle a meal at any hour of the
day or night. Heriot believed that
Tricki's problen was his greed. Do you think
a little tolerance would have done him |
good.Explain​

Answers

Answered by prettystefina11
75

Tricki is Mrs Pumphrey’s pet. He is a pampered dog and he was left to eat anything during any time of the day. Pumphrey would never listen to Dr Herriot when he kept trying to her make her understand that it is dangerous for Tricki to be so out of schedule.

Any dog can eat anything at any time of the day. And Mrs Pumphrey never controlled Tricki. He would never refuse a meal.

Dr Herriot exactly knew what Tricki’s problem was. Overfeeding was the problem. A little tolerance with the food would have done him good. But Mrs Pumphrey never controlled Tricki.

Answered by Anonymous
95

Here is your answer:

Dr Herriot was not entirely wrong in believing that Trick’s problem was greed. Tricki was indeed greedy, but Mrs Pumphrey only made matters worse by stuffing him with rich food.

Herriot did not lack tolerance; he was just stating the obvious. Trick’s ill-health made him concerned, and he made the observation as a veterinary doctor. Tricky, on the other hand, needed to exercise and control on his eating habits. It would have been good if he did not greedily gobble up everything that was placed in front of him. Mrs Pumphrey herself reveals that Tricky loved cream cakes and chocolates very much. Thus, Tricky ought to have been less gluttonous(greedy) and luxury-loving, and behave more like a dog.

Hope this helps you, if yes then please don't forget to MARK ME AS THE BRAINLIEST.

Also don't forget to RATE ME and click that THANKS BUTTON.

Love, Love.

Similar questions