Question

2. Look at the wordings of the two documents given below. The first column is from the 1990 Nes
Constitution. The second column is from the more recent Interim Constitution of Nepal.
1990 Constitution of Nepal
Part 7: Executive
2007 Interim Constitution
Part 5: Executive
Article 35: Executive Power: The executive
power of the kingdom of Nepal shall be
exercised exclusively by His Majesty.
The executive power of Nepal shall, pursuant
to this Constitution and other laws, be vested
in the Council of Ministers.
The executive functions of Nepal shall be
taken in the name of the Prime Minister.
What is the difference in who exercises 'Executive Power' in the above two Constitutions of Nepa
Keeping this in mind, why do you think Nepal needs a new Constitution today?​

Answer 1

Explanation:

uzoydiskdkfkdididkfkckfpflflug

Answer 2

Answer:

Explanation:

Chapter 8 of history in grade 8 talks about "Social and Political life".

Nepal is in an urgent need of a new Constitution on the present day. This is because in the year 1990, the executive powers were entirely given to the king only.

Later an interim constitution was drafted in the year 2007 and then the council of ministers took overall responsibilities i.e. executive powers as per interim Constitution and it was headed by the prime minister.

So the country moved rapidly from monarchy to democracy and this needed a set of ideals to follow. hence Constitution should be framed.