Question

2 points
A co-worker is undermining you. Currently, he is at a less senior position
than you in the company and hasn't been working there for long. However,
he is better educated than you and is also considered a fast learner. You
know from a third party that he is interested in taking over some of your
responsibilities. What is the most effective response in this situation?
You wait to see how things develop; at the moment this information is merely hearsay.
You call your co-worker in for a talk. You explain that cooperation is an essential
feature of any workplace and tell him you believe both of you can learn from one
another. If he refuses to understand you take more serious steps.
You do not want to take any chances with such issues. You report the matter to your
supervisor and advise him to consider replacing your co worker.
Since you do not want to make a "big deal" out of the issue, you ask a third party to
intimate to your co-worker that his behaviour is unacceptable.​

Answer 1

Answer:

Answer

Explanation:

Please follow me

Answer 2

Answer:

In the given case, We are being undermined by a colleague. In this case, I would prefer outright hostility to undermining because at least it’s overt and, therefore, easier to address. Undermining, on the other hand, is subtle. It isn't readily apparent like bullying or importunity. Due to the subversive nature of undermining, It's harder to spot and more delicate to report.

Being sabotaged in this way may make you question if you’re just being too sensitive or if you’re imagining effects. That's the evil genius of one who undermines. The situation can be tricky to identify and tough to deal with.

#SPJ3