3. How does he narrate the story of the tusker? Does it appear
to be plausible?
4. Why does the author say that Iswaran seemed to more than
make up for the absence of a TV in Mahendra's living quarters?
5. Mahendra calls ghosts or spirits a figment of the imagination.
What happens to him on a full-moon night?
6. Can you think of some other ending for the story?
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
Iswaran seemed to more than make up for the absence of a T.V. in Mahendra's living quarters because he provided a very good company to Mahendra. He chatted with Mahendra at night. He had the skill of narrating stories and anecdotes with such realism and suspense that Mahendra enjoyed listening to whatever he narrated.
Answered by
0
Answer:
question 3 Iswaran narrated the story of the tusker exaggeratedly. The Tusker, having escaped from the timber yard, stamped on bushes, tore up wild creepers and broke the branches at his will. hope it help you.please follow me.
Similar questions