Question

3. Make a Case Digest on selected topics: (20 points each)

a. Essential and Formal requisites of Marriage Navarro v. Domogtoy 259 SCRA 129 Republic v. CA 236 SCRA 257 Republic v. CA and Castro 236 SCRA 257 2.??​

Answer 1

Answer:

hear is the result found

Answer 2

Navarro vs Domagtoy

Explanation:

• This case involves a series of events that transpired in the respondent judge’s courtroom. The complainant, Marlyn Navarro, instituted a civil case against respondent judge. During the trial, the complainant alleged that the respondent judge had acted in contempt of court when he performed the marriage of his brother and sister-in-law, who are not legally married, behind closed doors.
• The second allegation involves a civil case filed by respondent judge, Navarro vs Domagtoy, before his court. The plaintiff in this case is a private citizen and respondent judge’s neighbour. The case was filed over the alleged boundary dispute between the two lots. To give you a general idea, the case was filed and was being tried by the respondent judge in the Court of his own creation, the Barangay Trial Court of Sto.
• The Navarro vs Domagtoy case involved a civil case for partition of immovable properties. It was heard by respondent judge, who rendered a decision in favour of the plaintiff. This decision is assailed. The assailing party argues that the decision is contrary to law and/or is void for lack of jurisdiction.
• The Civil Law case of Navarro vs Domagtoy was filed on April 28, 1995, before the respondent judge. It involved the question of whether the testator was justified in leaving his entire estate to his wife and children and not a single cent to the respondent. The respondent judge issued a decision in favour of the testator and the heirs, which was assailed by the heirs. The case is yet to be resolved with the Court.