Question

3) The subsidiary
Subsidiary Alliance system
was not at all benebeaal
to
Dl The British took
wars
year and​

Answer 1

Answer:

1)In subsidiary alliance an Indian ruler have to implement *British troops in their state either by giving some parts of territory Or paying for the maintenance of them troops.

2) the Indian rulers were not able to fight war or sign treaties with any other power .

3 ) The British were allowed to maintain a large troops under the expense of local rulers.

4 ) The Indian rulers got protection but lost independence.

5) If the ruler over subsidiary state died without leaving a natural heir for throne, the state Will be annexed by the British territory under Doctrine of Lapse policy.

Answer 2

Answer:

1) A subsidiary alliance an Indian ruler has to implement *British troops in their state either by giving some parts of the territory.

2) The Indian rulers were not able to fight war or sign treaties with any other power.

3 ) The British were allowed to maintain large troops under the expense of local rulers.

4 ) If the ruler over the subsidiary state died without leaving a natural heir for the throne.

Hope it helps you

Please mark me as brainliest

Explanation: