Question

30.04.2019
1.
Counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has already
preferred a writ appeal against the order dated 12.09.2018 passed in WP No.
3904 of 2003
2.
In view of the fact that the respondent has already filed a writ appeal
against the order dated 12.09.2018, this Court is of the opinion that it would
not be proper at this juncture for this Court to proceed further with the m
ost
contempt petition.
dingly, the present contempt case stands disposed of reserving
ACCO
petitioner to approach this Court again after disposal of the writ
the rig
appeal in case need so arises.
Sd/-​

Answer 1

Answer:

markdjdj

Explanation:

jajshavsvgsss