English, asked by parharkamalp99e94, 3 months ago

4. Make notes using headings and sub-headings of any one of the following passages :
I did not like Mr. Kelada.
I not only shared a cabin with him and ate three meals a day at the same table, but
I could not walk round the deck without his joining me. It was impossible to snub
him. It never occurred to him that he was not wanted. He was certain that you were
as glad to see him as he was to see you. In your own house, you might have kicked
him downstairs and slammed the door in his face without the suspicion dawning on
him that he was not a welcome visitor. He was a good mixer, and in three days
knew everyone on board. He ran everything. He managed the sweeps, conducted
the auctions, collected money for prizes at the sports, got up quoit and golf matches,
organized the concert and arranged the fancy-dress ball. He was everywhere and
always. He was certainly the best-hated man in the ship. We called him Mr. Know-
All, even to his face. He took it as a compliment. But it was at meal times that he
was most intolerable. For the better part of an hour then he had us at his mercy. He
was hearty, jovial, loquacious and argumentative. He knew everything better than
anybody else, and it was an affront to his overweening vanity that you
should disagree
with him. He would not drop a subject, however unimportant, till he had brought
you round to his way of thinking. The possibility that he could be mistaken never
occurred to him. He was the chap who knew. We sat at the doctor's table. Mr.
Kelada would certainly have had it all his own way, for the doctor was lazy and I
was frigidly indifferent, except for a man called Ramsay who sat there also. He was
as dogmatic as Mr. Kelada and resented bitterly the Levantine's cocksureness. The
discussions they had were acrimonious and interminable.
Or

Answers

Answered by chandudisc2003
0

Answer:

ndhdjsjsjsjsbshsjsnsnsnsbshhsbbdhshssjsndbbdbdvs

Explanation:

bvcxx

Similar questions