Question

4. State the various judgments given by different courts in the case of Ratlam
Municipality​

Answer 1

Explanation:

Supreme Court decision regarding a municipality that claims an inability to provide basic sanitation facilities and prevent street contamination, as required by Section 123 of the M. P. Municipalities Act of 1961, due to a claimed lack of financial ability; residents of the municipality successfully brought suit under Section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code to compel the municipality to remove the public nuisance.

I hope it helps you.

Please mark as Brainlist answer.

Answer 2

This case concerns the Ratlam municipality’s obligations to its people under Section 123 M. P. Municipalities Act of 1961. These obligations include the provision of sanitary facilities and the prevention of street contamination from a nearby alcohol plant. The residents of the Ratlam municipality, frustrated at the lack of sanitary facilities and the contamination in the streets, brought suit against the municipality under Section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code for public nuisance.  The municipality argued that, 1) the residents chose to live where there are no facilities, and 2) the authorities lacked the funds necessary to construct what was required to comply.