Question

4
The courts have interpreted the Right to Livelihood as being a part of the Right to​

Answer 1

Answer:

The Supreme Court in Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation[xx], popularly known as the “Pavement Dwellers Case” a five-judge bench of the Court now implied that 'right to livelihood' is borne out of the 'right to life', as no person can live without the means of living, that is, the means of Livelihood.