Question

5. Cite an example of a situation wherein the researcher can disclose Information as part of his/her legal duty to protect the common good. ​

Answer 1

Answer:

For a valid consent, information provided to a research subject should include, but not limited to, health condition for which the research is proposed; nature and purpose/reason of the study; study treatment or intervention and experimental procedures; probable risks and benefits associated with research participation

Explanation:

Answer 2

Explanation:

• There are several rules that might assist researchers decide when and when to reveal the private data they collect from research participants. For instance, the Children First: National Guidelines for the Protection and Welfare of Children (2010) were created to help those who interact with kids identify and communicate any safety or wellbeing concerns they may have.
• These recommendations are a helpful tool for researchers working with children who could come into contact with information or disclosures that indicate a kid is at danger of abuse or injury. The recommended practises and methods for bringing up such issues with the proper authorities are also outlined in these recommendations.
• The Irish Medical Council's Guide to Professional Conduct and Ethics for Registered Medical Practitioners, published in 2009, outlines the instances and circumstances in which a doctor may legitimately break patient confidentiality. A judge's order or legislation governing contagious diseases, for instance, may force doctors to legally divulge some patient information. In cases when it is in the public interest, the patient's interest, or the interest of others, a doctor may also share patient information without the patient's permission. The Irish Medical Council offers recommendations and best practises for clinicians to use in certain circumstances.
• Similar standards are provided to practitioners and researchers across several areas. What about circumstances not involving children or involving medical issues practitioners?. The safety and wellness of parties mentioned by study participants, as well as material that raises concerns about risk or injury to others, are other scenarios that researchers may occasionally find themselves in. When a participant discloses illegal acts, incidents, or intents they have participated in or are aware of, the researcher may be forced to weigh the public interest against the participant's right to secrecy in these circumstances.
• The following disclosures participants could make pose difficulties for researchers:
• Admitting that a person they know is vulnerable to abuse or injury
• An admission of a prior offence they were aware of or engaged in.
• warning of a severe risk to unknowing third parties
• Information regarding the commission of a crime
• These are troubling because they make it unclear when the researcher has a duty or right to reveal confidences that have been given to them, as well as to whom these disclosures should be made.
• The following considerations must be taken into account by the researcher in order to decide if there is a responsibility or right to violate confidentiality:
• Does the participant's right to privacy supersede or take precedence over the public good? Although the participant's private life is guaranteed by the law, this right is not unqualified.
• The researcher must limit the invasion of privacy while choosing whether to disclose a confidence to the proper authority—only what is required to lessen the danger or damage, and nothing more. In this manner, the public good is served while minimising the harm that the participant may experience from the disclosure.
• Is it conceivable that the participant would suffer damage as a result of the researcher's invasion of privacy? The researcher should make sure that any consents gained from participants were based on having explained such adverse repercussions to them in advance before opting to divulge a confidence to an appropriate authority.
• As a result, the participant is fully aware of the risks associated with participating in the study and has been warned up front about the possibility that certain disclosures may hurt them. Whom should the researcher disclose their findings to? The researcher must restrict who has access to private material, such as the Gardai, and only let those people. In most professional standards of conduct, it is generally acknowledged that if there is convincing evidence that someone is in danger of damage or abuse, sensitive information may need to be exposed.

Learn more about the cite an example

• https://brainly.in/question/25416581
• https://brainly.in/question/42241157
• https://brainly.in/question/29588033