Science, asked by Prabhmannat99, 8 months ago

50 points 50 points
What are advantage and disadvantage of Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Tibet (1912-1951) , Afghanistan, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Maldives as a if they were part of india.Write 15 advantage and 15 disadvantages

Attachments:

Answers

Answered by girija4144
1

Answer:

mark it as brainliest answer

Explanation:

advantages of Pakistan

You’re close to family.

cricket is ur addiction

culture

devoted to god

health care is cheap

disadvantages

Pakistan claims to represent the Indian subcontinent’s Muslims, but more Muslims live in India and Bangladesh put together than in Pakistan. In the absence of any geographical reason for its existence, Pakistan, so the assumption goes, can fall back only on Islamic extremism as an organizing principle of the state.

advantages of Bangladesh

It is a very densely populated country and hence some pitfalls in the basic infrastructure of the country can be observed, though these pitfalls do not interfere with the overall quality of the service.

disadvantages

Corruption in this country is another major problem. New businessmen may have to bribe people in every stage. However this can be avoided if you deal with the manufacturers directly. However, as language is also a barrier you should get help from sourcing agents if you are interested in Bangladesh sourcing.

advantages of Nepal

disadvantages

However, tourism has some negative impacts on the socioeconomic and environmental condition of the country. These problems include a food deficit, the inflated cost of food and other goods and deforestation. In fact tourism has also caused more defect in host communities. Crowding of locals and tourists may causes frustration and leads to the withdrawal of local residents in many places. Increased tourists also results in increased traffic which can hinder daily life of the local residents. Tourism can often cause environmental damage with risks like erosion, pollution, the loss of natural habitats, and forest fires. Reefs and other natural tourist attractions can suffer permanent damage.

advantages and disadvantages of Tibet

The advantages and disadvantages of the high plateau known as Tibet are identical. The place is extremely hard to reach, hemmed in on the south by the Himalayas and on the north by the almost equally high Kunlun mountains. The terrain is inhospitable, the plateau itself being about 15,000 feet above sea level. The climate is harsh, with violent swings of temperature between night and day at all times

The disadvantage is that few people can live here. The advantage is that few others want to. Until modern times it has been impossible for outsiders to arrive in sufficient force to subdue the inhabitants for long.

advantages of afghanisthan

AFGHANISTAN HAS A LARGE POETRY CULTURE STILL ALIVE TODAYThere are many beautiful sites to see in afghanistantradition is a very large part of afghan culture

disadvantages

the most obvious con, the ongoing war in afghanistanbeing A WOMAN IN AFGHANISTAN, YOU FACE DISCRIMINATION AND HARDSHIPSvery strict rules (mainly for women) imposed by the taliban

advantages of myanmer

Human Resources: Hard worker & easy to secure workers. High in English communication capability and comparatively cheap in labour cost

Public Safety: The crime rate is low, and the citizen have a gentle nature specific to Buddhist country

Potentiality: Market of population over 60 million

Feeling toward Japan and UK: Very friendly

disadvantages

Development of Laws: Undeveloped yet for access

Slowness of Permitting Process: At least 3 months from decision of investment to groundbreaking in a case of factory construction by overseas company

advantages of srilanka

Sri Lanka is emerging as a global destination of choice for knowledge solutions. Sri Lanka is ranked among the Top 15 Global Outsourcing destinations by AT Kearney and ranked among Top 20 Emerging Cities by Global Services Magazine.The growing knowledge solutions industry in Colombo offers a unique advantage for Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) to enjoy premium access to a high quality talent pool, which is becoming increasingly challenging in large established destinations such as India and China.

disadvantages

foreigners can't own land

traffic is horrible

transportation is worst

advantages of Maldives

THE GOOD Plenty of familiar destinations make it into TripAdvisor’s Top 25 Beaches in Asia list. Thailand is well represented, as are Indonesia, the Philippines and India. Ngapali Beach, in Myanmar, grabs top spot but it’s not what’s included in the list that catches the eye, rather it’s what isn’t. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a “best beaches” countdown that didn’t feature at least one sun-drenched, palm tree-swooning representative from the Maldives. Maybe TripAdvisor decided it wasn’t fair on the other “contestants”.

disadvantages

Unfortunately, the kind of lists the Maldives makes it onto these days are of the “10 Places to Visit Before They Disap­pear” variety. That gin-clear water lapping at sunbathers’ ankles is predicted to submerge the archipelago by the end of the century. At least 90 islands have disappear­ed so far, due to natural erosion and rising sea levels caused by global warming. Expect to see more seawalls built around resorts and sand being pumped back onto beaches

Answered by d687cyoyo
0

Answer:

Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh are large Muslim majority countries with very few resources per capita. We have one muslim majority state and even that is a nightmare to control.

Years of Myanmar's self imposed isolation has left it a very, very poor country. Even the new capital that was built was an utter failure as not many people came to live in it. The roads to the capital are empty.

Nepal is pretty much a continuum of Himachal Pradesh and Sikkim. Here resources are low, and the land comes with 26 million people who also practice the same religio-social evils that plagues this country. The constant political instability, due it not having strong democratic institutions has left this country impverished. The entire country will have to send money to economically develop this place. This will be too much to ask of South Indian tax payers who are already supporting mismanaged and poor states like Utttar Pradesh and Bihar.

Large landlocked countries like Afghanistan and Nepal? No! There simply is no way!

Sri Lanka and Bhutan come closest since: their size, population is small, resources per capita is reasonable and follow a “ Dharmic” religion- Buddhism and hence is technically a part of the wider Indian civilization. However these countries don't want to join India and also culturally they are a bit different.

The countries that stand to benefit by joining the Indian empire are in order:

Nepal(It'll stop being landlocked, and have better educational opportunities and get political stability )

Sri Lanka (If it were a State it could demand a rail link to Tamil Nadu similar to England- France Channel rail and hence “stop” being an island)

Maldives(could solve political instability and get more tourists)

The countries that would cause the most harm if it joined India would be:

Pakistan(terrorism, Islamism, insurgency, poverty)

Afghanistan (similar reasons + landlocked country)

Bangladesh (Sheikh Hasina already has her hands full, even though she's a dictator.)

Myanmar(waay too poor)

The only good part would be that we could unlock the economic potential of the North- East by de-landlocking it. The costs of inheriting Bangladesh for that to happen is just way too high in my opinion.

Similar questions