50 points for this question
DEBATING TECHNIQUES NEEDED!!
NOT RELATED TO TOPIC I NEED:-
I)STRUCTURE OR SEQUENCE OF THE COMPETITION AND SPEECH!!!
II)TECHNIQUES LIKE INTONATION INFENTUALITY !!!
III)PHRASE LIKE VOCABULARY FOR THAT (LIKE WHAT PHRASE WE CAN USE FOR STATING OPINIONS DISAGREEING .ETC.)!!
IV)OTHER STUFF IS ALWAYS WELCOME CONFIDENCE NOT INLCUDED!!
THANKS IN ADVANCE
Answers
The point of debate is not necessarily to come to a conclusion, but to exchange values and ideas. If someone introduces an argument you haven’t thought of, you might change your opinion. But most of the time, you are set in your opinion.
To take a look on the point of debates, especially political debates, you shouldn’t focus on the participants. Rather, you should focus on the audience. In the audience you might find people who haven’t yet taken a stand. These people are the ones who are susceptible of persuasion.
Taken from this point of view, the point of debates are to provide the uninformed public with arguments from either side of the subject. And there will always be valid arguments on either side of the subject. The undecided can then make their own conclusion of what to think about that subject. Do I find most important that this is good for the environment? Is it most important that it is best for the economy? Is the most important point for me that public surveillance can prevent crime, or is it the most important point that innocent people shouldn’t be monitored in the public? There is no true answer, but you have to take your own stand on what you think is most important.
This is the point of debates. Not to come to a conclusion, but to provide the audience with arguments from either stance, so the audience can form their own opinion on an informed basis, weighing arguments differently because of the different values we live by.
Hope it will help you and mark it as brainliest plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz
HEY
t really is quite simple.
The point of debate is not necessarily to come to a conclusion, but to exchange values and ideas. If someone introduces an argument you haven’t thought of, you might change your opinion. But most of the time, you are set in your opinion.
To take a look on the point of debates, especially political debates, you shouldn’t focus on the participants. Rather, you should focus on the audience. In the audience you might find people who haven’t yet taken a stand. These people are the ones who are susceptible of persuasion.
Taken from this point of view, the point of debates are to provide the uninformed public with arguments from either side of the subject. And there will always be valid arguments on either side of the subject. The undecided can then make their own conclusion of what to think about that subject. Do I find most important that this is good for the environment? Is it most important that it is best for the economy? Is the most important point for me that public surveillance can prevent crime, or is it the most important point that innocent people shouldn’t be monitored in the public? There is no true answer, but you have to take your own stand on what you think is most important.
This is the point of debates. Not to come to a conclusion, but to provide the audience with arguments from either stance, so the audience can form their own opinion on an informed basis, weighing arguments differently because of the different values we live by.
MARK AS BRAINLIEST