54. Sasaki km, aoki a, ichinose s, yoshino t, yamada s, ishikawa i. Scanning electron microscopy and fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy analysis of bone removal using er:yag and co2 lasers. J periodontol 2002;73:643-652.
Answers
Answered by
1
BACKGROUND: A thorough analysis of laser-ablated bone tissue is required before applying the technique to osseous surgery. In this study, we examine the morphological features and chemical composition of the bone surface after Er:YAG and CO2 lasers ablation.
METHODS: Six Wistar rats were used. An Er:YAG laser was used for ablation at an output energy of 100 mJ/pulse and a pulse rate of 10 Hz (1 W). Continuous CO2 laser irradiation was performed at an output energy of 1 W. Sites drilled using a conventional micromotor were used as controls. Analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was performed.
RESULTS: Er:YAG laser ablation produced a groove with similar dimensions to that produced by bur drilling, whereas the CO2 laser produced only a charred line with minimal tissue removal. SEM observations revealed that the groove produced by the Er:YAG laser had well-defined edges and a smear layer-free surface with a characteristically rough appearance and with entrapped fibrin-like tissue. The melting and carbonization produced by the CO2 laser were not observed on sites irradiated by the Er:YAG laser. FTIR spectroscopy revealed that the chemical composition of the bone surface after Er:YAG laser ablation was much the same as that following bur drilling. The production of toxic substances that occurred after CO2 laser irradiation was not observed following Er:YAG laser irradiation or bur drilling.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the use of Er:YAG laser ablation may become an alternative method for oral and periodontal osseous surgery.
METHODS: Six Wistar rats were used. An Er:YAG laser was used for ablation at an output energy of 100 mJ/pulse and a pulse rate of 10 Hz (1 W). Continuous CO2 laser irradiation was performed at an output energy of 1 W. Sites drilled using a conventional micromotor were used as controls. Analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was performed.
RESULTS: Er:YAG laser ablation produced a groove with similar dimensions to that produced by bur drilling, whereas the CO2 laser produced only a charred line with minimal tissue removal. SEM observations revealed that the groove produced by the Er:YAG laser had well-defined edges and a smear layer-free surface with a characteristically rough appearance and with entrapped fibrin-like tissue. The melting and carbonization produced by the CO2 laser were not observed on sites irradiated by the Er:YAG laser. FTIR spectroscopy revealed that the chemical composition of the bone surface after Er:YAG laser ablation was much the same as that following bur drilling. The production of toxic substances that occurred after CO2 laser irradiation was not observed following Er:YAG laser irradiation or bur drilling.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the use of Er:YAG laser ablation may become an alternative method for oral and periodontal osseous surgery.
Similar questions