A. Assertion (A): Introverts Personalities are focussed Themselves .
B. Reason (R): They are players of good of Chess, Snooker
1. Both (A) and (B) are true and ( R) is correct explaination of (A).
2. Both (A) abd (B) are true and ( R) is not correct explaination of (A).
3. (A) is true ,But( R) is false
4. (A) is False ,But( R) is True
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
A)An introvert is often thought of as a quiet, reserved, and thoughtful individual. They don’t seek out special attention or social engagements, as these events can leave introverts feeling exhausted and drained.
Introverts are the opposite of extroverts. Extroverts are often described as the life of a party. They seek out interaction and conversations. They aren’t one to miss a social gathering, and they thrive in the frenzy of a busy environment.
B)its states are continuous. A chess board only has 64 squares, a snooker table is a continuum.
You have more degrees of freedom/implications. A knight going from g1 and f3 can only get there in one way, while in snooker, you have spin and power as well. Implications: any single move can only have a direct effect on two pieces: itself and at most one more (if it's a capture). In snooker, in principle you could set all balls in motion through one hit.
Break even because:
Both are turn-based games (football isn't for example, and one can argue about tennis/volleyball).
Both have set pieces, ie, they start from the same initial position ,so you can practice some of it alone (openings in chess and at least breaking in snooker; also the re-spotted black is an identical state you can practise alone). Tennis is similar in practising serves, but card games are usually not (unless you count bridge bidding or you're happy to say that technically there's only trillions of trillions of trillions of possible deals). Finishing the table is also something you can practise for, although they will not always be on their spots and the cue ball will be in different positions. It's a bit similar to endgames in chess, where details can change but some of it can be memorised.
Less complex because:
In chess, grandmasters routinely calculate 6–7 plies (moves by both). In snooker, it's rare to think more than 3 balls in the future (red-black-red, say) as there's always some uncertainty.
In snooker, if you pocket one ball, you get to go again, which makes planning easier. In chess, even if you capture a piece :), your opponent can react to your plan and/or concoct their own.
Please mark me as brainliest