A city has developed a plan to provide for future water needs. 2 alternatives are being considered. the first proposes to build a full capacity tunnel now for $556,000. the second proposes to build a half capacity tunnel now at $402,000 which is adequate for 20 years and then build a second parallel half capacity tunnel at the same cost. the maintenance for the full capacity tunnel is $40,000 every 10 years and each half capacity tunnel is $32000 every 10 years. the estimated additional costs in single half capacity tunnel (due to friction losses) is $2000 per year. based on capitalized cost and a 7% interest rate, which alternative should be selected.
Answers
Answered by
0
the city has developed plan to provide feature water needs to alternative for being conditions the 1st April 2017 probably till dawn of War II process to call day after visit to Nal
Similar questions