A couple of years prior, specialists were cleared up in something of a symmetry craze. The thought was that you could comprehend something central about a person's quality by estimating its symmetry. A symmetric individual was taken to be of high calibre (quality), while an exceptionally topsy-turvy one was viewed as having an inferior quality. Individuals contemplated everything from flying creatures to blossoms. Be that as it may, at that point, quantitative geneticists made two related disclosures. On the off chance that offspring asymmetry was plotted against parent asymmetry, no relationship was reasoned. The second was that, on the off.chance that you chose on lop-sidedness, just allowing the most asymmetric parents to raise for a few ages, the level of unevenness/ asymmetry in the populace was unaltered. What is going on here?
Answers
Answered by
1
Answer:
ifk idk ksjsjsnsnmskskdkbdnsksoi
Answered by
0
Answer:
what is going on here was unalterable
Similar questions