A dull witted farmer decided to count his sheep
by first counting their legs. He counted 456 legs
and reasoned that he had 113 sheep. Assuming
each sheep had 4 legs, was he correct?
Attachments:
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
No he was wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
We can clearly see that he counted 4 legs
so he concluded that there were 113 sheeps
But 113×4=452
But he counted 456
that's why he was wrong.
Answered by
0
Answer:
no he is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
456 divide by 4 then u can find the answer
Similar questions