Social Sciences, asked by sangeetadas59023, 2 months ago

A friend from Nepal has written you a letter describing the political situation there. Many political parties are opposing the rule of the king. Some of them say that the existing constitution given by the monarch can be amended to allow more powers to elected representatives. Others are demanding a new Constituent Assembly to write a republican constitution. Reply to your friend giving your opinions on the subject

fast ans......​


omp80586: mara bhai block kar diya tumko mara phone la kar chipka se
sangeetadas59023: kon
sangeetadas59023: ho tum hum tph nahi jante
omp80586: Sanjana's brother I am
sangeetadas59023: oou

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
2

Answer:

Explanation:

In my opinion second option is best. Making small amendments does not shift whole power in hands of representatives. This does not make total responsibility on elected representatives what will happen in next years. So, a new and well drafted constitution is right choice.

In my opinion , In Nepal the best course of action is to give All Powers to the elected representatives. Let England the king of Nepal should be made the constitutional head of the state. Real powers of the executive should be vested with the cabinet headed by the Prime Minister. The cabinet should be responsible to the parliament. Judiciary should be independent and act as a Protector of the Constitution and the fundamental rights  of the people.

Answered by srijankumars6446
1

Answer:

A friend from Nepal has written you a letter describing the political situation there. Many political parties are opposing the rule of the king. Some of them say that the existing constitution given by the monarch can be amended to allow more powers to elected representatives. Others are demanding a new Constituent Assembly to write a republican constitution. Reply to your friend giving your opinions on the subjec

Similar questions