A historian wants to study about the early Vedic age she finds a microlith from around 9000 years ago and a manuscript from around 3500 years ago . which of these sources should she used to study the early Vedic ago and why
Answers
Answered by
5
Answer:
Explanation:
she should study about manuscript from around 3,500 years ago... 3500 BC: Pictographic proto-writing starts developing towards writing proper in Sumer, thus starting what is technically considered history.
Answered by
4
Answer:
Answer. she should study about manuscript from around 3,500 years ago... 3500 BC: Pictographic proto-writing starts developing towards writing proper in Sumer, thus starting what is technically considered history.
PLEASE FOLLOW ME
AND MARK ME AS BRAINLIST
Similar questions