Social Sciences, asked by owaisraza9832, 5 months ago

A historian wants to study about the early Vedic age she finds a microlith from around 9000 years ago and a manuscript from around 3500 years ago . which of these sources should she used to study the early Vedic ago and why

Answers

Answered by vidhijain20

Answer:

Explanation:

she should study about manuscript from around 3,500 years ago... 3500 BC: Pictographic proto-writing starts developing towards writing proper in Sumer, thus starting what is technically considered history.

Answered by frozen5681

Answer:

Answer. she should study about manuscript from around 3,500 years ago... 3500 BC: Pictographic proto-writing starts developing towards writing proper in Sumer, thus starting what is technically considered history.

PLEASE FOLLOW ME

AND MARK ME AS BRAINLIST

Previous Question

Next Question

Similar questions

Chemistry, 2 months ago

Write the mechanism of the acid catalysed dehydration of alcohol to alkene?

Math, 2 months ago

prosperity, recession and depression of a business is an example of ...

English, 2 months ago

SOCIAL ISSUES 1. Gender- Biased/Discrimination 2. Racism 3. Bullying 4. Fake News 5. Child Abuse YOUR PROPOSED SOLUTIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Science, 5 months ago