A invites B for his son's wedding. B accepts the invitation. In this case there is an agreement but no contract, since: (a) There is no consideration (b) There is no intention to create legal relationship (c) There is no written document (d) There is no formal acceptance of the offer
Answers
Heya,
The Answer is Option D
THERE IS NO FORMAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE OFFER
✌
The right response is (b) There is no intention to establish a legal relationship.
A legally binding agreement that establishes rights and obligations between two or more parties is known as a contract. An agreement must contain all four of the following components in order to be regarded as a contract: an offer, acceptance, consideration, and an intention to establish legal relations.
In the scenario given, B has agreed to accept A's invitation to A's son's wedding. As a result, A and B come to an understanding but not a contract. Because there is no intent to establish a legal relationship, there is no contract in this scenario. An invitation to a wedding is typically seen as a social invitation, not one that will bind the parties to any kind of contract.
In contrast, a contract would be created if A hired B to provide a specific service for his son's wedding and B agreed to do so in exchange for payment of a certain amount. This is because there was an intent to establish a legal relationship. All four necessary components—consideration (the fee), offer and acceptance, and the desire to establish legal relations—would be present in the contract.
As a result, even though an invitation to a wedding can result in an agreement between the parties, it is not regarded as a contract because it does not have the intent to establish a formal legal relationship.
For more such questions on contracts: https://brainly.in/question/55009273
#SPJ3