a man could be the father of his son's flesh , but that did not mean that he was also the father of his spirit ..do you agree with this.why)why not?
Answers
Answered by
2
A man could be a father of his son's flesh, but that did not mean that he was also the father of his spirit. This statement states that a father can stop his son from making a wrong move but he cannot stop his son from thinking that way. Father has control over his son's body not on his mind.
MARK IT BRAINILIEST
Answered by
0
" A man could be a father of his son's flesh, but that did not mean that he was also the father of his spirit. This statement states that a father can stop his son from making a wrong move but he cannot stop his son from thinking that way. Father has control over his son's body not on his mind.
HOPE IT HELPS
PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST ☺️
Similar questions