A murder occured in building at 10 th floor
When (police) ordered his assistant to go up in the flat and see what is the first eye report you prepare
His assistant said following things :
- door was unlocked
- table was messy
- glass was broken
- pistol was there with fingerprints on
- novel was open with page 41,42 open
- tv was on with aj tak channel
- wife, maid , and son was sitted on black colour sofa
- diary was open in which notes were there of deceased person
When assistant came below to inform ( police) that all this i saw
Then said the assistant () that u didn’t even went to that home.
How ???
He police caught that assistant was lying ?
Answers
Answer:
I’m not sure you worded this correctly because I can’t understand. What I will comment on is how did the assistant know that he was killed by a gun? There are so many ways to be murdered. Even if the assistant did know there was a gun in the premises it could've been there for safety purposes. It would take several weeks to find results for fingerprints. Seeing that the cops asked the assistant to look around shortly after the murder this is what leads me to think how the cop knew.
Answer:
Following points are doubtful that is why police stated that assistant never went to the murder sight.
Explanation:
1. As people are already there in the flat such as maid, son and wife so it makes no sense whether the door was locked or unlocked.
2. A messy table is a very common statement of any crime sight.
3. Broken glass, not a valid proof.
4. Fingerprints on pistol could be authenticated after the forensic test only.
5. The open novel page may be or may not be useful proof.
6. Family members could be watching the TV channel.
7. Position of a family member doesn’t give any valid proof related to the murder.
8. If he has read the diary notes should be able to tell what exactly written on it.
Thus, various scenario’s makes the police doubt on the assistant’s statement.