Question

A running back was the mvp (most valuable player) in 0.14 of the first 50 super bowls.
a. What percent of the mvps were running backs? % were running backs.
b. What fraction of the mvps were not running backs? Were not running backs.

Answer 1

14% of the mvps were running backs

43 mvps were not running backs

Step-by-step explanation:

mvps were running backs = 0.14

converting decimal to percentage

we get,

0.14 into percentage

0.14 × 100 = 14%

therefore ,

14% of the mvps were running backs

mvps were not running backs = 100% - 14% = 86%

now ,

fraction of the mvps were not running backs

= 86% of 50 super bowls

$\frac{86}{100}\times 50$

= $\frac{86}{2}$

or 43 mvps

hence ,

14% of the mvps were running backs

43 mvps were not running backs

#Learn more:

The minimum salary for a running back is $1.35 million per year. One of the Whalers' running backs was hurt during the last game. The injured player makes $2.7 million per year. If the Whalers trade the injured player, what is the maximum number of running backs they could sign?

https://brainly.in/question/6664425