English, asked by atharva6994, 4 months ago

a visit to Cambridge suppose you are firdaus kanga who got a chance to meet the famous astrophysics Stephen Hawking,how would you reflect your tough and experience after you visit to him write paragraph in about 100 words​

Answers

Answered by shubhamkh9560
3

Explanation:

Cambridge was the real England.

2. The writer phoned Stephen Hawking’s house

(i) from the nearest phone booth.

(ii) from outside a phone booth.

(iii) from inside a phone booth.

► (ii) from outside a phone booth.

3. Every time he spoke to the scientist, the writer felt guilty because

(i) he wasn’t sure what he wanted to ask.

(ii) he forced the scientist to use his voice synthesiser.

(iii) he was face to face with a legend.

► (ii) he forced the scientist to use his voice

synthesiser.

4. “I felt a huge relief… in the possibilities of my body.” In the given

context, the highlighted words refer to

(i) shifting in the wheelchair, turning the wrist.

(ii) standing up, walking.

(iii) speaking, writing.

► (i) shifting in the wheelchair, turning the

wrist.

Working with Text

1. (i) Did the prospect of meeting Stephen Hawking make the writer nervous? If

so, why?

(ii) Did he at the same time feel very excited? If so, why?

Answer

(i) Yes, the prospect of meeting Stephen Hawking makes the writer nervous

because Stephen Hawking was the ablest scientist on the earth. He was the

worthy author of world-renowned book “A Brief History of Time”. He had become

the successor to Issac Newton at the University of Cambridge. Meeting with such

a great personality made the writer nervous.

(ii) Yes, he felt excited at the same time because it made him stronger to see

somebody like him achieving something huge. This made him aware of the many

possibilities present before him, thereby helping him to reach out further than

he ever thought he could.

2. Guess the first question put to the scientist by the writer.

Answer

The writer might have asked the scientist if he had been brave to reach where

he had.

3. Stephen Hawking said, “I’ve had no choice.” Does the writer think there was

a choice? What was it?

Answer

The writer thought that there was a choice. Stephen Hawking could have chosen

to leave everything, and be sad and depressed. He could have sulked. However,

he chose to live creatively knowing the reality of his disintegrating body.

4. “I could feel his anguish.” What could be the anguish?

Answer

Stephen Hawking’s mind was active with many thoughts that he wanted to express.

However, his thoughts came out in phrases, without reflecting his feelings or

emotions. His sentences were mere lines, without any sentiment. The writer felt

he could understand his anguish and frustration at that.

5. What endeared the scientist to the writer so that he said he was looking at

one of the most beautiful men in the world?

Answer

The writer asked Stephen Hawking if he found it annoying that someone like him

came and disturbed him in his work. To this query, the scientist replied in the

affirmative, frankly and honestly. Then, he smiled his one-way smile and this

was what endeared him to the writer. The writer felt that he was looking at one

of the most beautiful men in the world.

6. Read aloud the description of ‘the beautiful’ man. Which is the most

beautiful sentence in the description?

Answer

The sentence describing the inner glow of Hawking’s personality which makes his

physical looks irrelevant is probably one of the most beautiful descriptions of

beauty.

Page No: 105

7. (i) If ‘the lantern’ is the man, what would its ‘walls’ be?

(ii) What is housed within the thin walls?

(iii) What general conclusion does the writer draw from this comparison?

Answer

(i) If the lantern is the man, its ‘walls’ is the human boy.

(ii) Light of life is housed within the thin walls

(iii) The writer draws a general conclusion that inside our body is the eternal

soul. Everything else is an accessory.

8. What is the scientist’s message for the disabled?

Answer

The scientists Stephen Hawking’s message for the disabled they should

concentrate on what they are good at. They should make the best use of them and

thanks, God.

9. Why does the writer refer to the guitar incident? Which idea does it

support?

Answer

When Stephen Hawking said that things such as disabled Olympics were a waste of

time, the writer agreed with him. He remembered the years which he spent trying

to play a Spanish guitar that was considerably larger than he was. He was very

happy when he unstrung it one night. It supports Stephen Hawking’s idea that

the disabled should only concentrate on what they are good at, and not take up

things unnecessarily.

10. The writer expresses his great gratitude to Stephen Hawking. What is the

gratitude for?

Answer

The writer expressed his gratitude to Stephen Hawking because he had been an

inspiration for him. He saw Stephen as the embodiment of his bravest self. He

hope it help

mark as brainlist

Answered by Aryantripathi042
5

Answer:

here is ur ans

mark me as brainlist

Explanation:

To aware the students that physical disability is not a hurdle in individual growth.

To create scientific thinking among the students.

To aware about their surroundings and having respect to all.

To create curiosity among the students to get information about disable people.

new words

Astrophysicist-One who knows about the branch of physics dealing with stars planets etc.

Ambushed- had a surprise meeting

Fed up with- become unhappy or sick

Frustrated- disappointed

Anguish- mental pain

Eternal- immortal

Claustrophobic- very small and suffocating

Embodiment- symbol

key points

1.To introduce about Firdaus kanga and other reputed scientist.

2.To tell the students that interview is the serviceable communication which provides information about the great celebrities.

3.To motivate the students not to be worried about physical disability and Hawking is the best example for the source of inspiration.

summary

The name of the lesson is ‘A visit to Cambridge’ and its writer name is Firdaus Kanga . In this lesson the writer could move only a wheelchair. He accepted his disability as a warrior. He made a journey all over the world. And he proved his ability is the greatest among normal people.

He went to Cambridge and met Mr. Stephen Hawking who is totally paralyzed although he wrote a great book. He thought that disable people should not be worried about their condition and always thinking positive. If those people get attention towards their ability then they can get easily their goal.

This lesson motivates the disable people also the normal people.

Similar questions