Social Sciences, asked by abi0411, 1 year ago

according to dual government, the British had the power and revenues but no responsibility. the nawabs had all the responsibility but no power or stable source of income. - explain.

Answers

Answered by Caitlin
32
British had all wealth but they didn't have internet in annexing territories as they were interested only in wealth. The nawabs were interested in both ruling and wealth.
mark as brainliest.
Answered by hotelcalifornia
0

British had political and economic power which gave them a source of income as well as decision-making power.

What is dual government?

  • As per this framework, the British had the political and monetary abilities, however, had no regulatory obligations.
  • They had outright military power and the option to gather income in Bengal.
  • Then again, the Nawab needed to bear every one of the obligations of the organization with no genuine power.
  • The arrangement of Dual Government was presented in Bengal by Robert Clive of the British East India Company.
  • It endured from 1765 to 1772.
  • The Diwani was done by the organization and the Nizamat by the Nizam.

Conclusion:

  • The authoritative powers are the ones requiring a dreary measure of responsibilities which were given to nawabs while the political and economic power which decides the leaders were with the British officials.
  • This made the dual government major extortion and interactivity of the British officials.

#SPJ3

Similar questions