Question

According to professor bloom's lecturer of the following established research finding(s)provide (s) evidence that language may not be necessary for abstract thought?

Answer 1

Answer:

Abstract thinking is based on Idea behind something. One has to go beyond the language to understand the real meaning of something which is not written or not seen. It's always symbolic of something else.

Explanation:

For example

In India we see Gandhi statue on a four road junction. It don't mean that we have to respect Gandhi ji but instead it symbolises gandhian ideas of truthfulness and righteousness.

Answer 2

Answer:

(i) individuals with certain language aphasias understand false beliefs,

(i) nonverbal infants under false beliefs on nonverbal measures,

(iii) nonverbal infants understand basic mathematical concepts

Explanation:

• "Language" is an important tool for human contact. Persons will think and place their feelings in expression or written form for others via languages. Only individuals(humans) are privileged by inherent processes of language learning.
• Professor Bloom states that "abstract thought has no relationship to language", however our understanding of it will affect abstract thinking, as we 'abstract,' our "thoughts or experiences" or what we are "attempting" to express by "way of words/emotions" as we always do while painting.

To know more

Importance of knowledge in speech and language processing ...

brainly.in/question/7610850