According to the editorial, what would happen if schools took away non-essential classes?
A) Students would lose their break from the boredom of traditional classes.
B) Students would save both the district and taxpayers a lot of money.
C) Students would miss out on receiving a well-rounded education.
D) Students would perform more poorly on standardized tests.
Answers
Answer:
According to the editorial, if the schools took away the non-essential classes:
C: The students would miss out on receiving a well-rounded education.
According to the editor, none of the activities like performing, poetry or sporting activities are non-essential since they are equally important as the other school subjects.
C) Students would miss out on receiving a well-rounded education.
Explanation:
There’s nothing like non-essential classes. Knowledge is an eternity, it can be about anything. The only conclusion is, we learn from every topic/subject. There’s nothing about non-essential lectures. Students will more and more knowledge be it an essential or nonessential.
One has to be specific with what are they learning and gaining from it. It implies all-round education stuff with proper learning and interests. Being productive is equal to being in any educational lecture. So those named, ‘non-essential’ classes are equally important for the students to make their age more productive in things around them.
Hence the answer, Students would miss out on receiving a well-rounded education, if schools took away non-essential classes according to the editorial.