History, asked by Alveya, 1 year ago

advantages and dis advantages of permenent settlementand mahalawari system

Answers

Answered by Ashita1512
0
HOLA MATE HERE IS YOUR ANSWER......

PERMANENT SETTLEMENT SUSTEM....

ADVANTAGES:

1)IT ENSURED THAT THE ZAMINDARS REMAINED LOYAL TO THE COMPANY.

2)FIXING THE LAND REVENUE ENSURED A FIXED STEADY INCOME.

DISADVANTAGES :

1)THE PERMANENT SETTLEMENT SYSTEM BENIFITTED LANDLORDS MORE THAN THE GOVERNMENT.

2)THE ZAMINDARS ILL-TREATED THE PEASANTS TO GET MORE REVENUE AND THE CONDITION OF THE PEASANTS BECOME WORSE.

MAHALWARI SYSTEM.....

ADVANTAGES:

1)The governmental income was not only stabilized but it was also sure of the amount of its yearly income. On the basis of the income the government could prepare the yearly budget.

2)The amount was revised periodically depending on the net produce.

DISADVANTAGES:

1)The peasants were exploited by zamindars , revenue collectors and moneylenders.

2)High rates of revenue extracted from peasants forced them to borrow money from the moneylenders on high rates of interest.Once they were caught in the debt-trap , they could never repay the money.






PLEASE MARK AS BRAINLIEST✌✌☄☄✌✌
Answered by qwtiger
0

Disadvantages:

1. the land settlement introduced market economy and did away with customery rights. Cash payment if revenue encouraged money-lending activity.

2. It sharpened social differentiation. The rich had access to the courts to defend their property.

3. Forcible growing of commercial crops led the peasants to buy food grains at high prices and sell cash crops at low prices.

4. The stability of the Indian villages was shaken and the entire set up of the rural society began to break up.

Advantages:

1. Revenue settlement was to made by village or estates with landlords.

2. In Western Uttar Pradesh, a settlement was made with the village communities, which maintained a form of common ownership known as Bhaichare, which were group ovf villages.

3. Revenue was periodically revised.

Similar questions