Environmental Sciences, asked by careenlyngdoh4, 5 months ago

advantages and disadvantages of coronavirus in many points​

Answers

Answered by Jasminesamson
2

Answer:

Advantages:

1. Lifestyle modifications

2. Health awareness

3. Importance of health

Disadvantages:

1. Financial burden on the world

2. Morbidity and mortality

3. Social and mental distance between people.

Hope this helps you

Answered by Anonymous
7

Answer:

Advantages

For example, among the 632 respondents who spoke of going to a family member or partner, the most commonly mentioned advantages of this were :

such a person was likely to be sympathetic or accepting (50%)

this person was likely to be able to understand or relate to the situation or problem (43%)

this person would know what to do (40%).

There was age variation on this last response, with 18-20 year olds significantly more likely than the average to say that a family member would know what to do (45%), and 21-24 year olds less likely than the average to say this (29%).

Of the respondents who said that they would talk to a friend their own age, two-thirds (65%) said that it would be an advantage that the friend would be able to relate to the situation. While 44% thought a friend would be sympathetic, only 21% said s/he would know what to do. There were no significant gender, age or geographic differences in this regard.

Among those respondents who said that they would talk to an older friend, three main advantages were commonly cited: sympathetic - 40%; know what to do - 41%; and can relate to the situation - 46%.

Among the respondents who mentioned talking to a local doctor or GP, most said that an advantage of this was that the doctor would know what to do (83%). An other advantage was that a GP would keep the matter confidential (23%).

Similar proportions of respondents attributed these same two advantages to consulting a school or non-school counsellor (73% - know what to do; 25% - confidential). There was a significant difference in the proportion of metropolitan and non-metropolitan youth who identified confidentiality as an advantage of talking to a counsellor (48% vs 15%). (However, as noted in Table 4, there was little difference in the proportions of metropolitan and non-metropolitan youth who mentioned going to a counsellor as a possible course of action.)

In summary, doctors or counsellors were most likely to be seen as knowing what to do, while family members were more likely to be viewed as sympathetic. The main perceived advantage of friends was that they were likely to be able to relate to the situation.

Disadvantages

Those respondents who stated they would use a particular sort of person as a source of help were also asked what the disadvantages of this approach would be; responses are again summarised in Table 5. Top of page

Overall, fewer respondents identified disadvantages than advantages. Because of there being generally lower response to this part of the question, there were fewer obvious differences among sub-groups of respondents.

For the most common course of action, talking to a family member or partner, the disadvantages most often identified were that the other person might become upset or that s/he might not be able to relate to the problem. It was also said that discussing such an issue might be difficult or embarrassing.

Among the 396 young people who said that they would talk to a friend their own age, relatively large numbers identified possible disadvantages in doing so. The disadvantage most often mentioned (40%) was the risk of breaches of confidentiality; people in the 14-17 age group in particular were concerned about this. Twenty-six per cent noted that such a friend may not have adequate knowledge (females were more likely than males to mention this - 30% vs 21%). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander respondents raised the issue of confidentiality (48%), and also mentioned possible lack of interest or sympathy (33%).

Of those 224 respondents who said they would talk to an older friend, few identified disadvantages. The most often mentioned disadvantage (11%) was the risk of the person not keeping the matter confidential. Non-metropolitan respondents in particular mentioned this (17%, as against 7% of metropolitan respondents).

Among the 31% of respondents who nominated a school or other counsellor as someone they might talk to, almost a third (30%) saw no disadvantages of this. The main disadvantage that was identified in relation to school counsellors was a concern about confidentiality (21%), while the most often mentioned disadvantage of other types of counsellors was seen to be possible difficulty or embarrassment in talking to them (16%). Both these issues had clearly emerged in the qualitative interviews.

Of the 24% of respondents who nominated their local doctor as someone they would talk to, over one-third (37%) did not identify any particular disadvantages to this. It is interesting, however, that 15% said that GPs may not be knowledgeable about such problems. Females were more likely than male respondents to suggest this (18% vs 11%); respondents aged 21-24 years, also, were more likely than the average to express a reservation about GPs' knowledge in this area (21% vs 15%).

good evening....

Similar questions