Among the followings, which one is not a consequence of irreversible expansion in a Rankine cycle?
reduction in cycle efficiency
increase in turbine exit quality
increase in pump work
increase in heat rejection at condenser
Answers
Answered by
0
Answer:
reduction in cycle efficiency
Answered by
0
Reduction In Cycle Efficiency is the correct option.
Among the followings, Reduction In Cycle Efficiency is not a consequence of irreversible expansion in a Rankine cycle.
The Rankine cycle is a heat engine constituted of four internally reversible
processes.
Consequences of irreversible expansion in a Rankine cycle are:-
- Turbine:- adiabatic and reversible (isentropic) expansion output: turbine >> pump (increase in turbine exit quality)
- Pump:- adiabatic and reversible (isentropic) compression (Increase in pump work)
- Condenser:- isothermal and isobaric compression qL = heat rejected to low temp reservoir (increase in heat rejection at condenser)
Hence, a Reduction In Cycle Efficiency is not a consequence of irreversible expansion in a Rankine cycle.
#SPJ2
Similar questions
Business Studies,
6 months ago
Math,
6 months ago
World Languages,
1 year ago
Math,
1 year ago
History,
1 year ago