An object is covering distance in direct proportion to the square of time elapsed. What conclusion can be drawn about the motion of the object?
(1) The object is moving with zero acceleration
(2) The acceleration of the object is constant
(3) The object is moving with increasing acceleration
(4) The object is moving with decreasing acceleration.
Answers
Answered by
17
Correct Answer is : Option 2:
The acceleration of the object is constant
Reason:
According to question,
Distance Travelled = d= kt²--------------1
where k is symbol of propritionality
t is time
Differentiating equation 1 w.r.t time we get:
speed=v=2kt---------2
again differentiating equation 2 with respect time we get
acceleration=2k a constant value
Hence The acceleration of the object is constant
Answered by
12
distance covered by the object is directly proportional to square of time elapsed.
e.g.,
or, S = kt² , where k is proportionality constant.
differentiate with respect to time,
dS/dt = 2kt
we know , rate of change of distance is known as speed ,
so, speed , v = 2kt
hence speed of object is directly proportional to time elapsed.
again differentiate with respect to time,
dv/dt = 2k
we know, rate of change of speed is known as acceleration { magnitude}
hence, acceleration = 2k
here it is clear that acceleration of the object is constant.
hence, option (2) is correct.
e.g.,
or, S = kt² , where k is proportionality constant.
differentiate with respect to time,
dS/dt = 2kt
we know , rate of change of distance is known as speed ,
so, speed , v = 2kt
hence speed of object is directly proportional to time elapsed.
again differentiate with respect to time,
dv/dt = 2k
we know, rate of change of speed is known as acceleration { magnitude}
hence, acceleration = 2k
here it is clear that acceleration of the object is constant.
hence, option (2) is correct.
Similar questions
Computer Science,
6 months ago
English,
6 months ago
Biology,
1 year ago
Physics,
1 year ago
Math,
1 year ago