Analyze and discuss the implications of scientists defying cultural beliefs in older times and what science would be like today without the scientific analysis and discoveries of Brahe and Kepler.
Answers
Explanation:
Some scientists made discoveries that showed reality to be at odds with cultural beliefs. Of those scientists, some of them had the balls to publicly point this out to anyone who’d listen, including the Churchly types who had a vested interest in keeping their sheep believing that the Bible is an accurate source of information about the real world.
Gallileo, Brahe and Kepler could have kept their mouths shut. Gallileo would have avoided some hassle. Hell, even Darwin might have decided not to risk having his very Christian wife making him sleep on the couch. But reality doesn’t kowtow to people in power with funny hats, and would have continued to differ from what the Bible says.
So absent those 4 and others like them, other scientists would have made the same observations, and eventually somebody would have spilled the beans. Unlike religious and other ideological movements that strongly depend on specific charismatic individuals and a lot of luck, scientific discovery doesn’t stand or fall with individuals, because reality is
Answer:
Without these scientists "the universe still revolves around earth"
Explanation:
A researchers made revelations that demonstrated reality to be in conflict with social convictions. Of those researchers, some of them had the balls to freely bring up this to anybody who'd tune in, including the Churchly kinds who had a personal stake in keeping their sheep accepting that the Bible is an exact wellspring of data about this present reality.
Galileo, Brahe and Kepler might have kept their mouths closed. Galileo would have kept away from some issue. For hell's sake, even Darwin could have chosen not to risk having his extremely Christian spouse making him rest on the love seat. In any case, reality doesn't grovel to individuals in power with amusing caps, and would have kept on varying from what the Bible says.
So missing those 4 and others like them, different researchers would have mentioned similar observable facts, and in the end someone would have let the cat out of the bag. Dissimilar to strict and other philosophical developments that unequivocally rely upon explicit magnetic people and a ton of karma, logical revelation doesn't stand or fall with people, since the truth is generally there for adequately brilliant individuals to notice and report.
Via examination: Where might Christianity be without Saul of Tarsus, who had the splendid thought of re-bundling Jesus' Jewish Fundie thoughts without circumcision yet with bacon to Greek gentiles? Or on the other hand without Emperor Constantine's strict nutter mother, who convinced Constantine to (at last) make the Roman Empire a Christian establishment? Without those two, "Khrestians" would have remained a Jewish periphery faction among numerous others that burnt out when the Romans ban hammered Judaism.
#SPJ2