History, asked by kavin27, 1 year ago

and we're magistrates in rome

Answers

Answered by StarTia
0
what this means....where is the question dude

ask a appropriate question so that we will help you

hope helps you

mark as the brainliest

riyanshi009: hii
Answered by abcxyz12
0
\mathcal{\huge{\purple{\star\:Hayy \: Mate...!! \:\star}}}


  <i>
During the period of the Roman Kingdom, the King of Rome was the principal executive magistrate.His power, in practice, was absolute. He was the chief priest, lawgiver, judge, and the sole commander of the army.When the king died, his power reverted to the Roman Senate, which then chose an Interrex to facilitate the election of a new king.

During the transition from monarchy to republic, the constitutional balance of power shifted from the executive (the Roman king) to the Roman Senate. When the Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC, the powers that had been held by the king were transferred to the Roman consuls, of which two were to be elected each year. Magistrates of the republic were elected by the people of Rome, and were each vested with a degree of power called "major powers" (maior potestas). Dictators had more "major powers" than any other magistrate, and after the Dictator was the censor, and then the consul, and then the praetor, and then the curule aedile, and then the quaestor. Any magistrate could obstruct ("veto") an action that was being taken by a magistrate with an equal or lower degree of magisterial powers.By definition, plebeian tribunes and plebeian aediles were technically not magistratessince they were elected only by the plebeians, and as such, they were independent of all other powerful magistrates


  <b>   <marquee> ❤️⭐I hope you mark as brainlist answer⭐❤️✨✨

kavin27: i do not want the para I want correct ans
Similar questions