English, asked by kshitijs, 8 months ago

Animals also understand the language of love and they love their freedom. But in the name of conserving wildlife, they are being put in zoos, depriving them of their natural habitat. In the light of this statement, comment ‘Are zoos the only and best option to conserve wildlife’?
Class 10
A tiger in the Zoo

Answers

Answered by 315173
22

Answer:

For some animals yes others not so much

Explanation:

Zoos make there money from animals that some people will never see, in there life like a tiger. That tiger could of had no mother to nurse it, or no father to feed it so a zoo would take it in. But on another an animals habitat could have been chopped down, and there is no place or the animals to go. Zoos will take it in and since those animals that weren't taken in will die the zoos would rebuild there species.

Hope this helped

Answered by khushipatel30
16

Answer:

No, in my point of view zoos are not the only best option to conserve wildlife. we can divide some types of animals in 2 parts and keep them in different areas for conserving their natural habitat. From keeping them into zoo we hurt them, we keep them far away from their freedom. or the other way is we can keep them together and leave it on nature because before zoos came all the animals use to leave together in jungle and still they exists for a long time.

Thank you

Similar questions