English, asked by rpkanakasabai, 10 months ago

answer all questions (jumbled statements)​

Attachments:

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
0

All my points below are based on the assumption that both the suns are 180 degrees apart and there is no concept of night. If they are not, night will prevail for a fewer hours and some points may change.

It is going to be hot as hell all the time.

Rate of evaporation will increase, and there will not be too much time for condensation, which will raise the moisture and humidity level in the atmosphere.

More dense atmosphere means more drag to any object that is flying, which in turn means more fuel consumption for air-lines, meaning more costly air travel and more pollution through air-ways.

Denser atmosphere means less range for bullets, hence more gun powder is required for the same range of bullets.

Moisture rich atmosphere will ensure more rains on the earth. But rains will still be confined to the areas nearer to large water bodies. Because, the air will be too heavy to carry so much water vapor to longer distances.

Land temperature will rise, destroying crops. But then if we have had 2 suns for a long time, we will have crops that have evolved to that temperature, meaning we may have totally different kind of grains.

Higher temperature can cause polar ice to melt, but again, the cap of ice will depend on the position of suns. If both the suns are at 180 degree apart, we may have more or less same cap of polar ice (I am not an expert here, but I am speculating). The only reduction in polar ice cap will be due to rise in temperature because of two suns.

Nocturnal habitat will not exist, and owls can never see.

You will not be needing so much of electricity to light up the cities.

Flight trainees will not have to practice night-landings (assuming both the suns are 180 degrees apart)

Solar energy would have become an important source of energy by now.

Answered by vjain0463
0

Answer:

why you have not given solution on my question

Similar questions