Answer any one of the following in 100-120 words (Marks: 5)
1.How would you assess Griffin as a Scientist and a human being? What qualities or values would you suggest will make him a better person?
2. How does Anne Frank feel about her father, her grandmother, Mrs. Kuperus and Mr. Keesing? What do these tell you about her?
*******************************************************************************
Agar kisi ne spam kiya maine uska muh tod dena h......
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
Answers
Answer:
HII PLEASE FOLLOW ME PLEASE FOLLOW ME AND THANKS MY ANSWER AND BRAINLEST MY ANSWER PLEASE
THIS IS THE CORRECT ANSWER OKK PLZZ FOLLOW ME AND THANKS MY ANSWERS AND BRAINLEST MY ANSWER HOPE IT IS HELP U
Explanation:
answer 1) In his final run from the people hunting him, he killed an old man with a rod because he bumped into him. If only he had maintained his morality, ethics, and conscience, he would have been a great scientist as well as a great human being. He should not have broken any law; nor should he have hurt any human being.
answer 2) Conscience is a cognitive process that elicits emotion and rational associations based on an individual's moral philosophy or value system. Conscience stands in contrast to elicited emotion or thought due to associations based on immediate sensory perceptions and reflexive responses, as in sympathetic central nervous system responses. In common terms, conscience is often described as leading to feelings of remorse when a person commits an act that conflicts with their moral values.
Explanation:
Griffin was a great scientist with an evil heart. If he had guided his ambition through morality, he would have avoided a tragic end.
Griffin had no conscience; he was callous towards other people and simply self-centered. He appeared to be at war with the entire mankind. All his actions stemmed from his desire to save himself, with not a thought about the pain he inflicted on others. That some traits were inborn can be seen in how he hid his work from his own professor, lest he or anyone else claimed the credit from it. When he was short of money he continued his experiments, without any thoughts of the consequences, he robed his own father, who committed suicide because the money was not his. He attended his father’s funeral without feeling sorry for his own act; instead he blamed his father for being a sentimental fool. He experimented on a cat, with no concern for the poor creature’s cries of pain. He threw it out and never tried to find whether it was alive or dead. He burnt down the house at Great Portland Street when the landlord and his sons found about his experiments and were horrified. He was only worried about covering his trail.
After becoming invisible he committed one brutal act after another, not because they were necessary for his survival, but simply because he enjoyed doing them. The way he looted his owner of a small costume shop, and left after striking the old man on his head, spoke volumes about his inhumanity. He terrorized Marvel when he was on the run, fought with the policemen. His plan to spread reign of terror among people using his powers of invisibility really shocked Dr. Kemp. He even tried to kill him for betraying him. In his final run from the people hunting him, he killed an old man with a rod because he bumped into him.
If only he had maintained his morality, ethics, and conscience, he would have been a great scientist as well as a great human being. He should not have broken any law; nor should he have hurt any human being.
hope it helps you☺☺